an in-between move

Cool kids read The Bellman.


Don't read this blog!

I mean, thanks for dropping by my little corner of the blogospheric backwaters, but the blog you should be reading is The Bellman. The stuff I post there is much, much less likely to be imbued with dormitive powers.


[German, from zwischen, intermediate + zug, move

Literally an "in-between move". A move in a tactical sequence is called a zwischenzug* when it does not relate directly to the tactical motif in operation. |source|

image copyright TWIC

From this position, black played a zwischenzug: 19…d5
(Linares 2002, 1-0)


about your blogger

David Rowland studies philosophy at the University of Illinois - Urbana / Champaign, where he's an active member of the Graduate Employees Organization. He used to play a lot of chess, but wasn't all that good. He has a blog. And email.



California Grocery Strike
Every man shall receive his own reward according t...
Zwichenzug media watch, international edition
Warmongers of Mass Deception (WMD)
DeLong keeps the data coming...
Noncompliant browsers
Zwichenzug media watch...
State of the Union
The Nation's (best?) Newspaper
Grocery strike update


error log

January 2004  
February 2004  
March 2004  
April 2004  
May 2004  
June 2004  
July 2004  
August 2004  
September 2004  
October 2004  
November 2004  
December 2004  
January 2005  
February 2005  
March 2005  
April 2005  
May 2005  
June 2005  
July 2005  
August 2005  
September 2005  
October 2005  
November 2005  
December 2005  


$zwichenzug$ sell-out zone





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under
a Creative Commons License.

Union Label

Direct Action
Gets the Goods!


some folks I know

Mark Dilley
a daily dose of architecture
Safety Neal
January Girl
mimi jingcha
Hop, Skip, Jump
ambivalent imbroglio
Brooke & Lian


some blogs I read

strip mining for whimsy
It's Matt's World
School of Blog
Fall of the State
Dru Blood
Echidne of the Snakes
Colossal Waste of Bandwidth
Running from the Thought Police
Bionic Octopus


some philosoblogs

Fake Barn Country
Freiheit und Wissen


some labor blogs

Confined Space
Working Life
Dispatches From the Trenches
Labor Blog
Eric Lee


some A-list blogs

This Modern World
Matthew Yglesias
Andrew Sullivan
Political Animal
The Volokh Conspiracy


some other links

Rule 33
This Week in Chess
War Nerd
National Priorities Project
Bible Gateway
Internet Archive
A Weekly Dose of Architecture
Orsinal: Morning Sunshine
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Safety Sign Builder
Get Your War On


some philosoblogging

Six views about reasons
Seidman on reflection and rationality
And another thing
Tiffany's argument for strong internalism
Internalism v. Externalism
What do internalists believe anyway?
Rationalism and internalism
The experimental method in philosophy
Advertising to children
On moral skepticism
A linguistic argument
More on Williams
Williams on reasons
General and particular
Normativity and morality
Political intuitions
What it is, what it was, and what it shall be
Objectivity and morality
Thinking revolution
Abortion and coercion
Moore on torture
On the phenomenology of deliberation
Even more Deliberation Day
more Deliberation Day
Deliberation Day run-down
He made a porch for the throne where he might judge, cont.
He made a porch for the throne where he might judge
Every shepherd is an abomination
Droppin' H-bombs
ad hominem

Sunday, January 25, 2004


Just because you're paranoid...

Before I get into this, let me acknowledge that I am fully aware that the thesis of this post borders on nutjob conspiracy theory.

That said, I think the Bush Administration is in the midst of a large scale operation designed to cushion the blow when they finally admit the obvious -- Iraq didn't have WMDs. Moreover, (this is the conspiracy theory part of it) I think David Kay is playing a crucial role.

This isn't the first time I' ve claimed that the Administration is preparing to admit that WMDs won't be found. What's new is the allegation of a Kay connection. Let me call a few things to your attention:

Kay is being positioned as a dissenting voice, but isn't being treated as one. This began after Cheney's NPR interview last week, in which he claimed to be confident that WMDs would be found. The very next day Kay was giving interviews in which he expressed views that flatly contradicted those of the Vice President, and this fact was trumpeted with headlines saying things like, "Departing Weapons Inspector Disputes Cheney's WMD Claims." This admission felt like a victory to those who opposed the war, and has made Kay a minor hero. Keep in mind, though, that Kay isn't the first person to occupy this role. The difference is that Kay, unlike Paul O'Neill and Joseph Wilson, hasn't been criticized and hasn't been the victim of dirty tricks.

As a dissenting voice, Kay has credibility among Bush's critics. Many Americans, and many more people in the rest of the world, are deeply suspicious of everything said by the Bush Administration. Kay, by admitting that WMDs don't exist, is able to claim integrity for himself that Bush and Cheney will never have. More importantly, Kay is able to locate himself as the privileged source for criticism of the Bush Administration's decision to go to war.

Kay's critique doesn't hurt the Bush Administration. In a series of interviews today, Kay has been suggesting the same master narrative that Cheney was pushing last week. Namely, that the Administration was right to believe that Iraq had WMDs, and that their policy was the only sensible alternative available. Moreover, any fault lies with the 'intelligence community,' rather than the Administration. Kay even told NPR, "I actually think the intelligence community owes the president [an apology] rather than the president owing the American people." And because Kay isn't going to be identified with the Administration anymore, it's politically safe to have him say, "Based on the intelligence that existed, I think it was reasonable to reach the conclusion that Iraq posed an imminent threat." (emphasis added)

So what you've got, over the last week or so, are the President, the Vice President, David Kay, and Colin Powell all talking about WMDs in ways that seem, on the surface, to be very much at odds. The President defiantly says we were justified, but limits himself to the carefully parsed, 'WMD program related activities.' Cheney sticks to the hard line. Powell appears as the voice of reason among the insiders, admitting the possibility that there may be no stockpiles. And then there's Kay, firmly positioned as an outsider, announcing that he no longer believes that pre-war stockpiles existed. But look a little deeper and they're all saying the same thing.

+ - + - + main + - + - +