!?

Zwichenzug

an in-between move

Cool kids read The Bellman.

+=+=+=+=+


Don't read this blog!

I mean, thanks for dropping by my little corner of the blogospheric backwaters, but the blog you should be reading is The Bellman. The stuff I post there is much, much less likely to be imbued with dormitive powers.

+=+=+=+=+


Zwischenzug
[German, from zwischen, intermediate + zug, move

n.
Literally an "in-between move". A move in a tactical sequence is called a zwischenzug* when it does not relate directly to the tactical motif in operation. |source|


image copyright TWIC

From this position, black played a zwischenzug: 19…d5
Adams-Kasparov
(Linares 2002, 1-0)

+=+=+=+=+


about your blogger

David Rowland studies philosophy at the University of Illinois - Urbana / Champaign, where he's an active member of the Graduate Employees Organization. He used to play a lot of chess, but wasn't all that good. He has a blog. And email.

+=+=+=+=+


recent

Notes from the peanut gallery
Democracy NOW! (okay, tomorrow)
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy a...
If you read this post, the terrorists will have wo...
Tiger in my tank
Light posting this week?
Backroom shenanigans
Changing the subject
Don't follow this link
Zwichenzug Culture Watch is on hiatus...

+=+=+=+=+


error log


January 2004  
February 2004  
March 2004  
April 2004  
May 2004  
June 2004  
July 2004  
August 2004  
September 2004  
October 2004  
November 2004  
December 2004  
January 2005  
February 2005  
March 2005  
April 2005  
May 2005  
June 2005  
July 2005  
August 2005  
September 2005  
October 2005  
November 2005  
December 2005  


+=+=+=+=+


$zwichenzug$ sell-out zone

+=+=+=+=+


syndication

Atom!



+=+=+=+=+


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under
a Creative Commons License.

Union Label


Direct Action
Gets the Goods!


+=+=+=+=+


some folks I know

Mark Dilley
a daily dose of architecture
dailysoy
Hannah
funferal
Safety Neal
eripsa
January Girl
mimi jingcha
bleen
Rambleman
Washburn
Hop, Skip, Jump
E
ambivalent imbroglio
Brooke & Lian

+=+=+=+=+


some blogs I read

strip mining for whimsy
It's Matt's World
School of Blog
Saheli
Fall of the State
Dru Blood
Echidne of the Snakes
Colossal Waste of Bandwidth
Running from the Thought Police
Bionic Octopus

+=+=+=+=+


some philosoblogs

E.G.
Philosoraptor
Left2Right
Fake Barn Country
Freiheit und Wissen

+=+=+=+=+


some labor blogs

Confined Space
Unions-Firms-Markets
Working Life
CGEU
Dispatches From the Trenches
Labor Blog
LaborProf
Eric Lee

+=+=+=+=+


some A-list blogs

This Modern World
Discourse.net
Matthew Yglesias
pandagon
Andrew Sullivan
Political Animal
Majikthise
DeLong
The Volokh Conspiracy

+=+=+=+=+


some other links

Rule 33
Dictionary.com
This Week in Chess
Baseball-Reference.com
War Nerd
National Priorities Project
Bible Gateway
Internet Archive
maxdesign
A Weekly Dose of Architecture
Orsinal: Morning Sunshine
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
NegativWorldWideWebland
Safety Sign Builder
Get Your War On

+=+=+=+=+


some philosoblogging

Six views about reasons
Seidman on reflection and rationality
And another thing
Aspirin
Tiffany's argument for strong internalism
Internalism v. Externalism
What do internalists believe anyway?
Rationalism and internalism
The experimental method in philosophy
Advertising to children
On moral skepticism
A linguistic argument
Whorf
More on Williams
Williams on reasons
General and particular
Normativity and morality
Political intuitions
What it is, what it was, and what it shall be
Objectivity and morality
Thinking revolution
Factoid
Abortion and coercion
Moore on torture
On the phenomenology of deliberation
Even more Deliberation Day
more Deliberation Day
Deliberation Day run-down
He made a porch for the throne where he might judge, cont.
He made a porch for the throne where he might judge
Every shepherd is an abomination
Droppin' H-bombs
ad hominem

Wednesday, March 17, 2004

 

The roads must roll

It's not making waves outside of Minnesota, but for my money the biggest domestic news story of the past several weeks is the Minneapolis transit strike. We're a few days short of two weeks in, but this is looking like another dispute that could last for months.

You might ask, "How dare those workers strike, knowing the inconvenience it could create??"

Well, the cause of the strike is simple enough to explain. The key (official) players are the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Minneapolis/St. Paul, Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty, and the Amalgamated Transit Union. Acting under Pawlenty's direction, the MTA decided to submit, as their final offer, a contract proposal that featured a whopping 1% raise, an increase in employee premiums for family health insurance, and, get this, a plan to phase out health insurance benefits for retired workers. [source]

That's right. The MTA's final offer includes a plan to renege on benefits that have already been earned. It's as if you were to pay into your 401k for 25 years and then have the bank tell you that they've changed their policy and will be reallocating the money to meet other lending needs.

The union balked. Maybe I'm biased, but I'm not willing to describe this one as a greedy union using its vast power to distort the market.

It looks like a bad time to be a pensioner. Suppose this strike drags on for months, the way the California grocery strike did. Every day that goes by, the workers on the picket line will have to ask themselves whether they're willing to forgo a paycheck in order to save somebody else's benefits. There's going to come a time when the answer will be 'no.'

So Pawlenty and the MTA have cooked up some pretty strong kung-fu. Unless the union has got Wong Fei Hong waiting in the wings, we may be looking at a beat down.

It gets worse.

Governor Pawlenty, it turns out, is beholden to an organization called the Minnesota Taxpayers League. These charming folks are from the Grover Norquist school of backroom bathtub accounting. Their hope is that the strike will drag on long enough for all mass transit customers to find alternative ways to get around. Once this is accomplished, the riderless MTA can be drowned in their basin of choice.

By the way:

The University of Minnesota estimated the annual metrowide -- not statewide -- spending on roads by all levels of government at $4.2 billion in 1998. That's 14 times the amount spent on transit, or about 96 percent of all government money spent on metro transportation. And it fails to count the private costs of driving -- money spent on cars, fuel, insurance, parking and maintenance, or the external costs of pollution, congestion and loss of productivity. [link]

Anyhow, the Taxpayers League has been doing their darndest to get stories into the press about how convenient it is not to have the roads congested with all of those bulky buses. They've even been releasing a new transit fact every day. Tuesday's was, "Transit will never serve US cities well because we don’t like living cheek by jowl."

(Another fact cited in Tuesday's Taxpayers League press release is that, "The most dense U.S. city is Los Angeles." If that sounds wrong to you, then you're right. This analysis from the Census Bureau shows that in 1990 L.A. ranked 8th in population density among the 20 most populous U.S. cities.)

Propaganda is as propaganda does, I suppose, and the Taxpayers League wouldn't be much to worry about if all they did was write press releases and stare longingly at the bathwater. But check out the plan their man Pawlenty came up with on Friday:

We will be making grants totaling $100,000 per week to nonprofit social-service agencies for additional transportation services they provide to transit-dependent people. The money comes from dollars that Metro Transit is saving while the buses aren't operating. If we find that the needs are greater than we expected, we'll expand the program. [link]

There's a part of me that wants to object to this proposal just because it's clearly part of an effort to bust the union. But I'm fair minded enough to acknowledge that the MTA has a right to continue to attempt to provide services during the strike, so I'll let that go.

The real problem is that the proposal transforms public transportation into something provided as a charity rather than as a city service. Take a minute and ask yourself this: what non-profit organizations in my neighborhood own and operate buses? If your answer was reasonably close to, "Why, I believe the Seventh Day Adventists have a bus or two," then your neighborhood is a lot like mine.

Faith-based busing for the poor!

Ahh, progress.


+ - + - + main + - + - +